|
hornplayer.net Information archive
Transposing - How to do it, and why do it!
|
|
I'm having flashbacks of orchestration class...
You've got it right. The horn sounds a perfect fourth lower than written, so to
match sounding pitch with written pitch, the composer/arranger must write the
part a perfect fifth higher (middle C becomes second-line G on a horn part in
F).
You've probably also noticed that in older music, the horn parts do not have a
key signature. There is only a notation on the horn part like "horn in Eb" or
"horn in Bb basso", or the dreaded "horn in H" (thank you very much, Herr
Brahms...). Strange as it may sound, this made life really easy for the natural
horn player - regardless of the key of instrument called for, the horn part was
written so that a written C was the tonic of work in question, which meant that
the different hand postions stayed the same. The hand position for a written C,
regardless of the key of horn called for, is open. As a very general rule, the
horns were pitched in the same key as the music. So in Blah-blah's Symphony in
D Major, the horn parts would be in D. Now, if Blah-blah had written his
masterpiece, Symphony in A Minor, he would have written two of the horn parts
in A, and the other two horn parts in C alto. Reason being is that the lowered
third in a minor key, when played on a natural horn, is stopped (or hand muted,
how ever you want to look at it). So if two horn players played a minor third
on natural horns, one note would be open and the other would be stopped, a
major faux-pas. If the second pair of horns is pitched a minor third above
tonic, in this case C, minor intervals played by a horn in A and a horn in C
would come out with both notes being open.
Now, let's for a moment pretend we are playing Blah-blah's Symphony in A minor,
written in 1791 to commemorate the death of Mozart (Blah-blah was the only one
who did this, by the way, and he had to finish it himself because Sussmeyer was
out of town), and we are playing it here in 1999 on our shiny new modern
valve-encrusted horns. The horn players get together before rehearsal to try to
figure some things out, because one pair of horns is in A and the other pair is
in C, but the problem is there are two transpositions for C, that being C alto
and C basso, and the horn part doesn't specify which, and the horn players
begin cussing the inaccuracy of Kalmus. The principal horn looks at the score
and tries his part out a little, and knowing that a part in A basso would be
extremely rare, is going to play his part by reading it up a major third,
thereby placing the horn in a better-sounding range when playing with the
winds. Now, most of the C horn parts you will find are C basso, but if the
players were to read a part down a perfect fourth while the A players are
reading up a major third, the interval between horns would be way too wide. So
the C players deduce that the parts must be in C alto, and they will read them
up a perfect fifth. For the natural horn players in 1791, they would choose the
C alto crook over the C basso crook to put them in the correct range.
How many of us have either asked, during our student days, or heard from our
students, "why don't they just print new parts in F for all this old junk and
save me the hassle of learning to transpose all the time?"
"Good question, my young apprentice!" (hehehe...)
First of all, printed music is expensive. Imagine the cost of having all the
parts re-written for horn in F. I think Mr. Thompson can shed a little more
light on this. It's probably cheaper now that we have things like Finale on our
computers, but you still have to pay some bloke to sit in front of a computer
and plug the parts into the program, rather than have them engraved.
Second, from my own experience, having learned transposition in the days when a
powerful desktop computer was a machine that had a whopping 8K of RAM and no
hard drive, when I see an orchestral horn part that has been transposed for me,
it makes things very difficult for me to play the thing. I remember playing
Beethoven 7 a few years back (Beethoven, by the way, was a great admirer of
Blah-blah, and predicted a brilliant future for the then 4-year old prodigy,
but then again, Beethoven was deaf, so what did he know?). Anyway, the
librarian passed out the parts and gave the horns parts in F. The two students
in my section were of course overjoyed, but I was not. I had to work really
hard at not reading the F horn part up a major third out of habit. After the
first rehearsal, I explained to the librarian that I wanted the section to play
from the original parts, and she said ok, no sweat, and told me that she didn't
think we would want them. I said well, my students don't, but I do, and waving
my hand in front of my student's faces, did my best Jedi Mind Trick, saying
"these are not the parts you are looking for. You want the originals..."
Of course, all this really falls to pieces when we discuss Wagner and his
rather twisted ideas about writing for the horn. The Prelude to Act III of
Lohengrin springs to mind. For God's sake, man, pick a key and go with it!!
Tuckwell has stated in his book "The Horn" that Wagner learned everything he
knew about the horn from Franz Strauss, who as we all know didn't particularly
like Wagner, so it wouldn't surprise me a bit if Herr Strauss threw a couple of
curve balls at Herr Wagner just for fun when explaining the concept of writing
for natural horns. Not to mention that Strauss was married to the daughter of a
prominent local brewer, so he probably got all his beer for free, or at least
at greatly reduced prices. Most people don't know that Strauss became a spokes
model for Pschoor, the brewer, and his product took off like no other,
attracting the attention of another brewer named Hacker, so they formed a
partnership, and now Hacker-Pschoor produces some of the finest beers in all
Bavaria. Unfortunately, Hacker-Pschoor is a transposing beer. You only have to
remember that during Oktoberfest, if you order a beer in C alto, you will get a
half-litre. If you order a beer in C basso, you will get a full litre. You have
to pay close attention to the size of mug you are holding, because if you don't
specify whether your festbier is in alto or basso, whoever is tending bar may
try to fill your alto mug with basso beer, making a really big mess on the
floor, or he may fill your basso mug with alto beer, making you feel cheated
out of your DM 1.75.
Tuba players get the whole keg. And fistfights usually break out between the
tubas and the horns as to who gets tapping and posession rights.
Apologies in advance,
Gary
|
|
There was a recent inquiry about the art of transposition. There are
several ways to do this. For the majority of my students this method seems
to work the best:
1. Relationship of our horn to the crooked (tuned) pitch of the natural
horn.
For those uninitiated in the art of transposition, a brief
background is necessary. Natural horns came with a set of tuning crooks
that afforded a variety of key selections. Thus, if a particular work was
written in A, then the player would put in the A tuning crook. Likewise,
if the piece was written in C, then the C tuning crook was used.
As to the question of why this was done: On an unvalved brass
instrument a particular series of notes are available. These notes are
produced by overblowing the instrument and increasing the lip tension.
Notes produced thusly are overtones which come of the fundamental. The
fundamental is the lowest possible note available on an endblown tube. The
series of notes that are produced from this are arranged in a predictable
order.
A well-versed natural hornist would know which particular notes
were naturally in tune, as well as which overtones needed to have
intonations adjustments with the lip and/or hand. Also, chromatically
altered pitches could be bent from these natural overtones, affording
chromaticism.
There were 4 basic hand positions 1. totally removed from the bell,
2. our present day hand position, 3. 3/4 stopped (liked stopped horn but
the heel of the hand is unsealed), and 4. stopped horn. For those
uninitiated in hand horn, try this:
- play a 2nd line g
- play a 2nd space a using a 3/4 stopped position (you actually
will
bend down the pitch of the C
- now with the hand fully stopped, play a B
- next. play the C with your normal hand position
The natural horn parts were written in C (occasionally in G, F, or
Bb) because hornists would always know the appropriate hand position to use
in all occasions. It would have been devastating for certain pitches to be
played open in one key and hand stopped in another.
For modern day performers, performing on original (non-transposed)
parts give us a clue as to effective performance. For instance if the
original passage called for heavily stopped notes, it would be appropriate
for us to use a more subdued shading and approach to this passage. Also,
it can give us clues as far as intonation tendencies, as well.
THus, you need to know the relationship of the original key to that
of the modern horn. Here is a procedure that should help clarify the
procedure. I am giving you an example of transposint to D HOrn.
On a staff, write a whole note F-this represents the pitch of our
instrument. Next write the note representing the tuning crook of the
natural horn (D). Next, identify how far away the D is from our home pitch
of F (a minor 3rd/or 1 1/2 steps). Thus, to play the same sounding note as
the D instrument, we have to play(transpose) the note a minor 3rd lower.
Thinking down every note a minor 3rd may drive the novice crazy.
Thus, I recommed plugging in an automatic key signature. Look at the key
signature of this selection (90% will be in C). Put a whole note
representing the key note (C) on the staff. Since we have identified that
the D horn is a minor third lower than the F horn, we can use this same
process in selecting an automatic key signature. Looking at the C
(original key), locate the corresponding interval a minor third below this
note; it is A.
So, if you play the music down a third, using the automatic key
signature of A, you will successfully be able to play a D horn part. Since
we have a variety of horn keys in which to transpose, you need to be aware
of which are low transpositions (downward intervals) and which are high
transpositions (upward intervals)
So, here is a handy-dandy chart for all you novices out there:
| Low Transpositions: | Interval | Auto Key (orig. in C) |
| E | m2 (1/2 step down) | B major (or just think everything down 1/2st.) |
| Eb | whole step | Bb |
| D | m3 | A |
| C | P4 | G |
| B (stands for Bb) | P5 | F |
| *H (stands for B nat.) | A4/D5 | F# |
| |
| High Transpositions: | | |
| G | Whole step up | D |
| A | M3 | E |
| C alto | P5 | G |
| B alto | P4 | F |
*This is the nasty one. It probably is best to read down a P5, then raise everything a 1/2 step. Thank the Lord this does not occur often!
There are others that are less common, occuring mainly in operatic works.
These are Db (down) and Ab. Ab is especially problematic as there are
instances that this is done as a low and high horn transposition. There is
no clear indication as to when this is done. However the general rule I
have gleaned from the opera players on this list is that 19th C Italian
opera composers tend to use the Ab horn as a low horn.
|
|
The other day my band director asked me why horn players had to transpose all the time. I explained about how horns didn't use to have valves etc., I assume most of you know why. But then he said, So why didn't some horn player come along and rewrite everything in F? Can someone please enlighten me on this? He thinks it is just a macho horn players thing now. Or is that all it is?
|
|
You might try looking at the symphonic literature. much music was
written for the natural horn during the period right after it was
"discovered" by the orchestra. This is to say, the time period
after it was found to produce a nice veiled, smoothe sound for
the orchestra when the right hand was placed in the bell. Before
this time, the open sound (without the hand in the bell) was
considered quite raucous and abrasive, and as such, the horn was
not suitable for such music. This is what I recall from my reading
of the well-known Farkas book "The Art of Playing the French Horn".
In any event, have you ever played any Haydn or Beethoven symphonies or
similar? In a single season of orchestral playing (4th part), I had to
transpose music written for the natural horn in each of the following
keys: C basso, D, Eb, E, F, F#, Ab, A, Bb, and B. Obviously, some of
this music was written for natural horns built in those keys. In some
pieces, the use of crooks is implied when you have a 6- or 8-measure
rest with the annotation "Change to D" or "Change to A" or "Change to C".
The music is ALL written, "In the key of C for the horn in D" (eg, Haydn's
Italian symphony) and then, without key signature, the 4th part is
asked to "change to A", whereupon the key signature is "In the key of
C for the horn in A". I have also played some (Mozert? Beethoven?)
stuff calling for two horns: Horn in C and Horn in Eb in the same
passage! Key of C for both instruments! Talk about a way to confuse
an unprepared band director! But this is standard in the orchestral
literature. Band arrangements simply transpose it on paper for horn
in F.
Anyway, As valve technology became available, ultimately the natural
horn in the keys of F and Bb, sometimes A and F alto became more common.
Piston valves of trumpets are just not practical for the horn.
(Experimentally at a music store, I once played a $7,000 Yamaha
with a piston thumb valve and hated it. Try it some time.) The
rotary valve, though much harder to machine due to precision tolerances,
is the only way to get practical valves for the horn. The reason seems
to be speed. Rotary valve trumpets have a reputation for "extremely fast"
action. I suppose this speed is required in order for the horn sound to
not "break up" as I experienced on that Yamaha.
Anyway, aside from the digression into valve technology, your band
director is obviously not familiar with much of the orchestral
literature or he would know about such transpositions. My old
just-for-fun horn is a no-name model in Bb with a thumb valve
that can be used for transposing into A or for use in conjunction
with stopping the right hand to avoid transposing the fingering
down half a step while playing stopped passages (NOT muted passages,
stopped passages. The sound is completely different. Read Farkas.)
Ask your band director to play a "stopped" passage on a trumpet and then
ask him what fingerings to use. He won't be able to tell you
because there is no such thing as the "stopped" sound phenomenon
on any instrument that I am aware of except the horn. Try playing
some fast, stopped Prokofiev passages without knowing how to transpose.
THAT will make a believer out of you! At least theese passages that
I am familiar with are for Horn in F!
Next point: Have you ever noticed that most band literature is
written for "Horn in F" or for "F horn". The "F" is definitely
NOT for (F)rench!!! This term has carried over from orchestral
literature into the band literature of the 19th century and onward
where the world is usually written relative to C, Bb, or Eb
instruments or for bass clef in concert pitch, even though these
were Bb instruments. And then there is the horn. Our favorite
anomoly. Both F and Eb exist. Ever played a C alto horn?
In summary, the older orchestral literature, being written for the
instrument, "horn in X", was for the valveless natural horn, later
for the horn with crooks, and then finally for the valved horn.
Players need to be able to transpose in order to play music of this
era because it seems to me that it represents 1/4 to 1/2 of all
orchestral horn literature. (Please correct me if my guess is way
of whack.) Band literature does not have this problem, because
it evolved after the invention of the valved horn and after Horn
in F and Horn in Eb became the first and second designs of choice,
respectively. (Comments?) Furthermore, playing stopped horn requires
knowledge of transposition.
|
|
Many publishers offer parts both in F and in the
original key. But not all music is available this way. Even in the
band music world, many older pieces have only Eb horn parts.
We do spend a great deal of time and energy learning how to
transpose. It is understandable if we sometimes transpose with a bit
too much bravura.
On the other hand, I sometimes find it easier to transpose than to
read the transposed part. This is especially true for classical works
by Mozart, Haydn, Betthoven, et al where the transposition is
initmately related to the key.
Richard Strauss was one of the last great proponents of horn
transposition. His revision of Berlioz's treatise on orchestration
gives a late romantic explanation on why chromatic brass should
transpose. There's an English translation available from Dover
Books. Your band director should buy a copy and read it.
|
|
Hmm...though I went through the Eastman School of Music playing a no-name
Eastern European compensating double with the standard rotary valves, for
the last 25 years of amateur playing I have used a compensating Selmer
(third valve ascending) with three piston valves (rotary thumb for F/Bb
change). After all, the true "French" horn is called a "Cor a pistons."
Of course, I have to put up with jibes such as "the alto horn section is
over there, fellow!"
As far as transposition goes, all players of any instrument better have
some facility if they wish to play professionally. Furthermore, the few
times I have encountered F parts transposed from "natural horn" originals,
I find them more difficult to read at sight (especially if I have played
the originals before.)
|
|
I've never heard a satisfactory explanation. No doubt inertia is part of the answer.
Among the "explanations" I've heard...
- Orchestras have a large investment in their music libraries and can't afford to buy new scores just to get the horn parts "fixed". [But couldn't they just buy the horn parts?]
- If an orchestra were to transcribe new horn parts from it's existing music it would be infringing the original copyright.
The other side of the question is "Are 'Horn in F' parts readily available for works that originally called for horns in other keys?" If there is any truth to (2) then nothing will change until someone with the rights publishes such parts.
Beyond that, some people feel that it is important to have the music in it's original form to appreciate what the composer wrote. I don't buy it. Do clarinet players have a lesser appreciation of their parts as a result of the key signature matching
both the music and their instrument? Is a contemporary composer similarly disadvantaged when writing for "Horn in F"?
|
|
I have perfect pitch, and I'd been playing piano for 7 years and horn for 2 before I figured out that I had perfect pitch and that was why my first notes of the day always startled me. Once I recognized the problem, and understood that there was a reas
on I was disoriented, it ceased to be a problem: I just learned thatI needed to shift gears, as it were, when I switched instruments and I instinctively knew how to do that. Then picking up trumpet (Bb) a few years later was no problem.
We horn players with perfect pitch have a funky challenge: to reconcile
the "horn" C to "concert" C somehow. Some people, as you do, play naming
games. Some people, as I did, learn completely different sets of names
for different instruments, and in the process can start to lose the
fully-fixed pitch sense. I still have perfect pitch, but I don't always
know what key I'm thinking in. (The fact is that perfect pitch is
nothing more than pitch memory, and memory can adjust. I noticed that in
my college orchestra, those of us who had perfect pitch tended to
fluctuate up and down relative A440 throughout the month, usually
together. The oboist continued to tune us off an electronically-metered
A440, but we all fluctuated in our opinions about that A; sometimes it
sounded flat or sharp to us, and we tended to agree about it, even
though we could see the needle pointing right at 440. I'd be interested
in hearing other experiences on that.)
Which insanity is better? For most practical purposes, you should do
what works best for you. However, at the professional, esoteric level, I
would argue for the latter (learning different sets of names), because a
C scale should not sound exactly like a D scale, etc. [Look up
"temperament" in the Harvard Dictionary of Music, read the various
cross-referenced entries, and then come back to this paragraph.] I
believe the unique character of each scale gives it a characteristic
color, and I believe the "basic" pitch reference of each instrument
contributes to that instrument's character. Granted, vertical harmony
(tuning according to the chords in the ensemble) takes priority, but
linear intonation (tuning according to the scale) is still relevant. I
believe that playing horn (and transposing for horn in other keys) is
best done by the clef system, where on some level you adjust yourself to
the notion of a new C. But remember, this is all esoteric and utterly
irrelevant for most players.
At any rate, it is not totally insane to refer to notes by concert
pitch. At the professional level, you hear it a lot. When working with
other instruments in an ensemble, it is essential, because
non-transposing instruments tend not to be particularly fluent in "horn"
pitch. However, beware that some conductors looking at the score would
rather refer to what's written, others to what's sounded. You should be
flexible and adapt to each conductor's preference without calling
attention to it. Sometimes this is confusing; remember to smile.
Some quick notes on related topics:
Some reason that horn parts are not transposed:
- the transposed parts invariably contain a second-generation layer of
errors
- the transposed parts obscure the relationship of written notes to
natural horn harmonics, and the techniques that would be employed by a
natural horn player (think about how you would play the first phrase or
two of your favorite Mozart concerto on hand horn; it will give you some
ideas about the dynamic shadings Mozart expected to hear)
- after years of transposing, most horn players are more reliable at
transposing than they are at remembering written key signatures (which
is why even modern music written for untransposed horn will have
accidentals where other instruments have key signatures; take note,
beginning copyists)
How to transpose?
- interval method: change each written note by a fixed interval, e.g.
major second or perfect fourth
- clef method: imagine that the clef centers on a different line or
space, and squint a little bit to read the score that way; at first,
this is hard, but with practice it becomes second nature and quicker
than the interval method
- combination of both: eventually most horn players develop an
instinctive ability to transpose that is some combination of both, with
various methods employed to figure out "hard" things. For example, when
reading bassoon parts (don't ask), I imagine that the bass clef is
actually a treble clef Eb horn part and drop it an octave; I imagine
that the tenor clef is bass clef G horn. These are actually more
indirect, but they're somehow easier for my twisted brain.
And finally, a handy trick for figuring out how to transpose a given key:
- What is the relationship of your horn to that key?
E.g., F horn and Eb parts: F to Eb is down a major second (whole
step). Bb trumpet and D parts? Bb to D is up a major third.
- Do that to the part!
E.g., read the Eb part down a major second on your horn. For any
written note, play the note a whole step lower. Written G is "your" F.
Read the D trumpet part up a major third on your Bb trumpet: written G
is "your" B.
Don't forget to learn the foreign names for keys. For instance, B
natural in German is H, Bb is B, and Eb is Es. In French, D is Re. Etc.
|
All the views expressed in these articles are those of the author of the article. Hornplayer.net is in no way responsible for opinions expressed. Hornplayer.net is not responsible for any actions taken as a result of information contained within this website.
Back to the archive index
|
The information published herein is believed to be correct, however, the author assumes no responsibility for any errors or omissions. Hornplayer.net does not support, condone, endorse or agree with any statement shown on the site, other than those that are explicitly stated as being the official position of hornplayer.net. This contents of this website includes data added by anonymous third parties, and is dynamically included in the pages with no verification by the owner of hornplayer.net. While effort is made to ensure that all third-party data is appropriate and within the bounds of the law, hornplayer.net accepts no responsibility whatsoever for any statements or claims made.
|